1. Leo XIV explicitly or humorously said that the single language before the tower of Babel was a lack of diversity. §10: “Let us avoid the ‘Babel syndrome’ … the uniformity that levels differences; the claim of a single — even digital — language…” 2. From the 224 footnotes, Pope Francis is cited 55 times. 3. At the press conference, Leo XIV said that the Church and the US tech company ‘Anthropic’, will walk together to "find the way for humanity." 4. The encyclical includes lots of personalist philosophy, including the erroneous idea of an “infinite” dignity of the person and “total gift of self.” 5. The first third of the document is primarily a theological and social-philosophical framework. The encyclical only becomes focused on technology and AI around §90 of the total 226 paragraphs. 6. Leo XIV's summary of past Catholic Social Teaching includes economic and political documents but ignores marriage and family. 7. Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism,... are framed as religions of …མང་བ།
Pick up your cross and follow me not dialogue your way to heaven? Thy kingdom come not thy fraternity of people come. The cross of original sin take the blank out of your eye and repent nobody goes to the Father but thru Jesus . World is at war and your stuck in liberation theology man centered universe. Original sin teaching is hot potato in todays church Fairy tale Disney theology its a small world after all theme runs through this fake Pope. His ghost writers must of been smoking a joint doing this while listening to Simon & Garfunkel
“Thanks to Francis, the discourse on migration is now established,” the pro-homosexual Madrid Cardinal José Cobo told ReligionDigital.org (May 23). He asks the rhetorical question why Leo XIV is going to the Canary Islands. His answer: “For the same reason Francis went to Lesbos or Lampedusa.” One of Cardinal Cobo’s most troubling ideas is his desire to “redefine” human dignity according to “the criteria of our time.” #newsFmjosltxra
Cardinal Víctor “Tucho” Fernández, a soft-porn author and the prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, criticized the Congregation’s Notification on the Works of Fr. Jon Sobrino, S.J. from 2006. At the time, the congregation was led by Cardinal William Levada. The notification was issued with the approval of Pope Benedict XVI. It declared that some of the Spanish Jesuit’s works contain “notable discrepancies with the faith of the Church.” On May 12, speaking at Pontifical Urban University, Tucho claimed that the notification “does not encourage the effort to take seriously the context in which theological reflection takes place.” He attacked the notification for declaring that theology rooted in “the context of the poor” was “inadequate and dangerous”. Tucho also criticized the idea that theology can begin only from ecclesial tradition without serious engagement with lived historical realities. Major Ecclesiological Shift Another revelation from Tucho: “Some …མང་བ།
Another revelation from Tucho: “Some time ago, in the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, the instruction given to nuncios in those countries was that they should carefully monitor possible deviations and dangers of inculturation. Now, instead, they are asked to encourage initiatives and processes of inculturation in the lands where they serve as pontifical representatives.”
The very fact that Leo allows Fernandez to remain in charge of the DDF speaks volumes about Leo - Leo and Fernandez embody the Modernist heresy - and are solidifying the errors and demonic inversion of truth warned about by Pope St. Pius X.
Professor Anna Rowlands, says that encyclicals "traditionally expose false idols," and that in Pope Leo's XIV first major encyclica he cautions that "we will not be saved by AI either, or its post and transhumanisms."
Rather endorsing false idols: "In rejecting the mindset of violence, interreligious dialogue plays a decisive role, because at the heart of the great spiritual paths lies a message of peace. Whereas those who use the name of God to legitimize terrorism, violence or war betray his true nature, for to fight in the name of religion means attacking religion itself. The “spirit of Assisi,” evoked by Saint John Paul II and carried forward by Pope Francis — for example, through his dialogue with the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar — shows that believers can draw upon the most authentic sources of their particular spiritual traditions, where there is no room for “sanctified hatred.” (MH 223)
Today, Bishop Philippe Christory, 68, of Chartres visited and blessed the pilgrims of the Roman Rite on the road to Chartres, France.
Sur la route de Chartres, les pèlerins ont reçu avec joie la visite et la bénédiction de l’évêque de Chartres, au cœur de cette chrétienté vivante et fidèle à la tradition de l’Église.
Pope Leo XIV is ultimately not against AI but aims to guide it toward the common good, writes Nico Spuntoni on LaNuovaBq.it (May 24). He has seen a preview of the encyclical ‘Magnifica Humanitas’ that will be published tomorrow. Leo XIV writes about a crossroads between self-sufficiency and solidarity. The pious-sounding solution Leo XIV offers to avert dehumanization through AI is "the mystery of the Incarnation". As did Leo XIII facing the social question of the 19th century, Leo XIV believes to offer an answer “to another industrial revolution and the developments in artificial intelligence, which pose new challenges for the defense of human dignity, justice, and work.” Leo XIV talks consistently with the overused word “discernment” to guide the actions in an age of widespread familiarity with artificial intelligence. The encyclical warns of danger of humanity gaining excessive power over itself and against moral irresponsibility resulting from overreliance on artificial intelligence. …མང་བ།
Anthropic’s Chris Olah at the Vatican press conference to present Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical on AI: “There is a real possibility that AI will displace human labor at very large scale. If that happens, supporting those displaced will be a moral imperative of historic proportions.”
The first papal encyclical on artificial intelligence, Magnifica Humanitas (May 15, 38,000 words), contains lots of truisms but also a bit of everything and nothing. The central contradiction of Magnifica Humanitas is that it condemns centralized technological power and “Babel-like” global systems, while simultaneously demanding supranational governing structures to regulate AI worldwide. In the encyclical, "Babel" becomes a symbol of a civilization built on centralized power, uniformity, and human self-sufficiency. §5 warns that private, often transnational actors possess “resources and capabilities superior to those of many governments,” giving them “impressive power over all of humanity.” However, the proposed solution is stronger international coordination and global governance of AI. The encyclical calls for an “international order” (§33), “universal fraternity” (§44), and globally shared moral principles for governing AI. §64 calls for “more effective forms of cooperation …མང་བ།
It's a requirement to be a Catholic (in other words - not a heretic/apostate) l to be Pope. Even if he recanted, he would still not be eligible to be Pope. Please see Cum Ex Aposolatus Officio.
Meaningless Babbling Because today is the Feast of Pentecost, one must speak seriously about what modern emotionalism has transformed into spectacle. The so-called “speaking in tongues,” popularized by Protestant Pentecostalism and later imported into parts of the post–Second Vatican Council Catholic world through the charismatic movement, became far less a sign of sanctity than a theater of confusion. In Scripture, the miracle of Pentecost was not meaningless babbling or ecstatic performance. The Apostles spoke real languages so that peoples of different nations could understand the truth of God Our Lord Jesus Christ. The miracle was clarity, order, evangelization, and conversion, not frenzy, convulsions, or unintelligible noise. The Holy Spirit descended like fire to illuminate minds, not to suspend reason. What many charismatic circles present today, whether Protestant or Catholic, appears as collective emotional intoxication: repetitive sounds, forced ecstasies, artificial tears,…མང་བ།
Speaking in tongues means that everyone will understand and comprehend what you are saying, even though you are not speaking their language. The charismatic mumbo jumbo is just like the holy rollers; if it feels good, do it.
Yes, if we live to see it. Revenge should only be by God in His Time. Revenge is normally caused by Jealousy, one of the Deadly Sins. It is sad to see!
"89. To this command all the obedient and holy angels, submitted themselves and they gave their full assent and acknowledgment with an humble and loving subjection of the will. But Lucifer, full of envy and pride, resisted and induced his followers to resist likewise, as they in reality did, preferring to follow him and disobey the divine command. This wicked prince persuaded them, that he would be their chief and that he would set up a government independent and separate from Christ. So great was the blindness which envy and pride could cause in an angel, and so pernicious was the infection that the contagion of sin spread among innumerable other angels."
[Venerable Mary of Agreda – XVII Century AD; born: Agreda, Spain/died: Agreda, Spain; ‘Lady in Blue’; Abess; Writer; Mystic] 87. It is proper, that I also explain what was made known to me concerning the kind of honor and excellence, which Lucifer aspired to and envied. As in the works of God there is measure, number and weight (Wis. 11, 21), his Providence decided to show to the angels, immediately after their creation and before they could incline to diverse ends, the purpose for which He had created them with such an exalted and perfect nature. Of all this I obtained the following information: At first they received a more explicit intelligence of the being of God, one in substance, trine in person, and that they were commanded to adore and reverence Him as their Creator and highest Lord, infinite in his essence and attributes. All subjected themselves to this command and obeyed it, but with a certain difference; the good angels obeyed through love and on account of the justice of …མང་བ།
"91. The decree constituting him inferior to the Mother of the Incarnate Word, our Mistress, he opposed with horrible blasphemies. Turning against the Author of these great wonders in unbridled indignation and calling upon the other angels, he exhorted them, saying: “Unjust are these commands and injury is done to my greatness; this human nature which Thou, Lord, lookest upon with so much love and which thou favorest so highly, I will persecute and destroy. To this end I will direct all my power and all my aspirations. And this Woman, Mother of the Word, I will hurl from the position in which Thou hast proposed to place Her, and at my hands, the plan, which Thou settest up, shall come to naught.”